Gen Z Spending Habits Statistics 2026
By Axis Intelligence Research
Co-author: Sarah Davis | Last updated: August 18, 2026 | License: CC BY 4.0
American Gen Z households spent an average of $54,830 in 2024 against average pre-tax income of $63,549 — an outlay-to-income ratio of 86.3%, the highest of any working-age generation and 10.9 percentage points above the U.S. household average. Axis Intelligence Research scores the cohort at 49.2 on the Gen Z Spending Strain Index, 1.67 times the all-household reference.
Quick Answer
Gen Z consumer units — Bureau of Labor Statistics terminology for households headed by someone born in 1997 or later — spent $54,830 per household in 2024, roughly 70% of the $78,535 all-household average. The gap narrows dramatically once income enters the picture: Gen Z spends 86.3 cents of every pre-tax dollar, against 75.4 cents for the average U.S. household. Across 11.1 million Gen Z households — 8.2% of all U.S. consumer units — Axis Intelligence Research puts total 2024 outlay at $611.3 billion, up 29.6% year over year — almost entirely because 2.2 million more Gen Z households came into existence, not because any individual household spent much more.
Key Findings
- According to Axis Intelligence Research’s analysis of the Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Expenditure Survey 2024, Gen Z households spent 86.3% of their pre-tax income in 2024 — the highest ratio of any working-age generation and 10.9 points above the 75.4% all-household figure.
- Axis Intelligence Research estimates aggregate Gen Z household outlay at $611.3 billion in 2024, up 29.6% from $471.6 billion in 2023, with 25.0 percentage points of that growth attributable to household formation rather than per-household spending.
- Rented dwellings absorb 54.5% of the Gen Z housing budget, against 21.5% for all U.S. households, per Axis Intelligence Research calculations from BLS Consumer Expenditure Survey 2024 data.
- Gen Z households spent $2,372 on education in 2024 — 1.51 times the $1,569 all-household average — while spending $2,297 on healthcare, just 37% of the all-household figure, according to BLS Consumer Expenditure Survey 2024.
- Axis Intelligence Research scores Generation Z at 49.2 out of 100 on the Gen Z Spending Strain Index (GZSSI), against a U.S. all-household reference reading of 29.5 — a 1.67x multiple as of August 2026.
How Much Does Gen Z Spend Per Year?
The workhorse number is $54,830 per household in 2024, published in Table 2602 of the BLS Consumer Expenditure Survey, which classifies households by the birth year of the reference person. That figure is up 3.67% from $52,891 in 2023 — more than double the 1.62% increase recorded across all consumer units over the same period.
Most coverage of Gen Z consumer spending stops at the headline dollar amount, which is the least interesting thing in the table. A 23-year-old renter and a 52-year-old homeowner with two children are not running comparable budgets, and comparing their gross outlays tells you almost nothing. The ratio is where the story sits.
Household Spending and Income by Generation, 2024
| Generation (birth years) | Average annual expenditures | Average income before taxes | Expenditure-to-income ratio | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Generation Z (1997+) | $54,830 | $63,549 | 86.3% | BLS CE 2024 |
| Millennials (1981–1996) | $85,302 | $118,982 | 71.7% | BLS CE 2024 |
| Generation X (1965–1980) | $96,941 | $140,313 | 69.1% | BLS CE 2024 |
| Baby Boomers (1946–1964) | $69,303 | $83,812 | 82.7% | BLS CE 2024 |
| Silent Generation (1945 or earlier) | $51,147 | $49,208 | 103.9% | BLS CE 2024 |
| All consumer units | $78,535 | $104,207 | 75.4% | BLS CE 2024 |
Ratios calculated by Axis Intelligence Research. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Expenditure Surveys 2024.
One honest caveat that most generational spending coverage skips: Gen Z does not hold the top spot outright. The Silent Generation spends 103.9% of pre-tax income, which sounds alarming until you remember that retirees fund consumption out of accumulated assets, and the survey measures income, not withdrawals. That is drawdown, not strain. Among generations still earning their money, Gen Z is the outlier — and it is not close.
Sarah Davis: The 86.3% figure is the one to watch, and it is worth being precise about what it is not. It is not a savings rate; personal insurance and pensions ($6,357 per Gen Z household) sit inside the expenditure total, so retirement contributions are counted as spending, not saving. It is a gross-outlay ratio against gross income. And it is still 17.2 points above what Gen X manages at the same measure. When a cohort earns half what Gen X earns and clears 86 cents of every dollar before taxes are even taken out, the residual — the part that absorbs a broken transmission or a rent increase — is thin by construction.
What Share of Their Income Does Gen Z Spend? The Gen Z Spending Strain Index (GZSSI)
A single ratio compresses too much. Two households can both spend 86% of income while facing entirely different exposures — one building equity, one writing rent checks; one with a revolving credit line as a shock absorber, one with four biweekly instalments and an autopay date.
So Axis Intelligence Research built the Gen Z Spending Strain Index (GZSSI) — a 0–100 composite that measures how much of a cohort’s consumption is pressured rather than chosen. Higher readings mean more of the budget is locked, leveraged, or exposed. Every input is a federally published figure, and the formula is reproducible from the numbers printed below.
Formula:
GZSSI = (0.30 × Outlay Load)
+ (0.25 × Shelter Exposure)
+ (0.25 × Deferred-Payment Reliance)
+ (0.20 × Credit Access Deficit)
- Outlay Load = (expenditure-to-pre-tax-income ratio − 0.50) ÷ 0.50 × 100. Anchored so that spending half of pre-tax income scores 0 and spending all of it scores 100.
- Shelter Exposure = rented dwellings as a share of total housing outlay × 100. Rent buys shelter and nothing else; mortgage principal buys shelter and equity.
- Deferred-Payment Reliance = mean of the buy-now-pay-later use rate and the late-payment rate among BNPL users.
- Credit Access Deficit = 100 − credit card ownership rate. Households without a revolving line have no conventional buffer between a shock and a missed payment.
GZSSI Component Readings, as of August 2026
| Component | Weight | Generation Z | U.S. all-household reference | Source of inputs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outlay Load | 30% | 72.6 | 50.7 | BLS CE 2024 |
| Shelter Exposure | 25% | 54.5 | 21.5 | BLS CE 2024 |
| Deferred-Payment Reliance | 25% | 27.0 | 21.0 | Federal Reserve SHED, October 2025 |
| Credit Access Deficit | 20% | 35.0 | 18.0 | Federal Reserve SHED, October 2025 |
| GZSSI total | 100% | 49.2 | 29.5 | Axis Intelligence Research |
Axis Intelligence Research, GZSSI baseline reading, August 2026. Licensed CC BY 4.0.
The baseline reading is 49.2 for Generation Z against 29.5 for the U.S. all-household reference — a multiple of 1.67. Because this is the first publication of the index, it carries no historical comparison; the 49.2 is a baseline against which subsequent readings will be measured.
What moves the number is worth stating plainly, because it is not the thing most commentary blames. Deferred-payment reliance contributes only 6.75 points of the 49.2. Shelter exposure and outlay load together contribute 35.4. The strain is structural — where Gen Z lives and how much of their income the basics consume — not behavioural. Whatever you have read about avocado toast and instalment-plan sneakers, the arithmetic points at rent.
Where Does Gen Z Money Actually Go? Full Category Breakdown
Below is the complete major-category breakdown for Gen Z households against the all-household benchmark. Every figure comes from the 2024 Consumer Expenditure Survey annual release and appears as a row in the downloadable dataset.
Gen Z Budget Breakdown vs All U.S. Households, 2024
| Category | Gen Z ($/yr) | Gen Z share | All households ($/yr) | All-household share | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Housing | 19,559 | 35.7% | 26,266 | 33.4% | BLS CE 2024 |
| Transportation | 10,083 | 18.4% | 13,318 | 17.0% | BLS CE 2024 |
| Food | 7,616 | 13.9% | 10,169 | 12.9% | BLS CE 2024 |
| Personal insurance and pensions | 6,357 | 11.6% | 9,797 | 12.5% | BLS CE 2024 |
| Education | 2,372 | 4.3% | 1,569 | 2.0% | BLS CE 2024 |
| Healthcare | 2,297 | 4.2% | 6,197 | 7.9% | BLS CE 2024 |
| Entertainment | 2,207 | 4.0% | 3,609 | 4.6% | BLS CE 2024 |
| Apparel and services | 1,660 | 3.0% | 2,001 | 2.5% | BLS CE 2024 |
| Personal care products and services | 678 | 1.2% | 978 | 1.2% | BLS CE 2024 |
| Miscellaneous | 656 | 1.2% | 1,218 | 1.6% | BLS CE 2024 |
| Cash contributions | 526 | 1.0% | 2,292 | 2.9% | BLS CE 2024 |
| Alcoholic beverages | 465 | 0.8% | 643 | 0.8% | BLS CE 2024 |
| Tobacco products | 267 | 0.5% | 352 | 0.4% | BLS CE 2024 |
| Reading | 88 | 0.2% | 125 | 0.2% | BLS CE 2024 |
| Total | 54,830 | 100% | 78,535 | 100% | BLS CE 2024 |
Shares calculated by Axis Intelligence Research. Components may not sum exactly to totals because of rounding in the source tables.
Three lines in that table do most of the explanatory work.
Education at 4.3% versus 2.0%. Gen Z households spend $2,372 a year on education — 1.51 times the all-household dollar figure, and more than double the budget share. This is the tuition-paying years landing inside a household budget that has not yet grown to absorb them.
Healthcare at 4.2% versus 7.9%. At $2,297, Gen Z healthcare outlay is 37% of the all-household figure. Youth is genuinely cheap here, and it flatters the rest of the budget. It also means one of the largest natural expense increases in a household’s life is still entirely ahead of this cohort.
Cash contributions at 1.0% versus 2.9%. Charitable giving and support sent to other households runs $526 against $2,292. Gen Z is, in the survey’s own accounting, a net receiver rather than a net sender — a point the Federal Reserve data below makes explicit.
Why Is Gen Z Housing Spending Different From Everyone Else’s?
The housing share difference — 35.7% versus 33.4% — looks unremarkable. The composition underneath it is not.
Of the $19,559 Gen Z households spend on housing, $10,667 goes to rented dwellings. That is 54.5% of the entire housing budget, against 21.5% for U.S. households overall. Owned dwellings absorb just $2,477 of the Gen Z housing budget, against $9,310 for all households. Nineteen percent of Gen Z consumer units are homeowners; 81% rent.
This is the mechanism behind the strain reading, and it is arithmetic rather than argument. A mortgage payment splits into interest, taxes, and principal, and the principal portion is a transfer from cash into equity — it leaves the checking account but stays on the household balance sheet. A rent payment does not split. Every dollar of that $10,667 is consumed. Two households can post identical housing shares and be on opposite trajectories.
Sarah Davis: Follow this into the utilities line and it gets sharper. Gen Z spends $2,697 on utilities, fuels, and public services against $4,736 for the average household — but $885 of the Gen Z figure is cellular phone service, versus $1,359 for all households. Gen Z is not paying less for connectivity because they use less of it. They are paying less because they are on fewer lines and smaller dwellings, and because family plans are one of the invisible subsidies the survey cannot see. Household-level data has a structural blind spot when a fifth of the cohort’s consumption is being funded from someone else’s account.
That blind spot is measurable, and the Federal Reserve measured it. In the 2025 Survey of Household Economics and Decisionmaking, 47% of adults aged 18–29 reported receiving help from someone outside their household to pay an expense in the prior 12 months, with cell phone bills, general expenses, and housing costs the most common categories. And 49% of adults under 30 lived with a parent in 2025 — up 12 percentage points from 2019.
Nearly half this cohort does not appear in the Consumer Expenditure Survey as its own consumer unit at all. Their consumption is recorded inside their parents’ budgets. The $54,830 describes Gen Z households that exist independently; it says nothing about the roughly half that have not formed yet.
How Much Does Gen Z Spend on Food and Dining Out?
Gen Z households spent $7,616 on food in 2024, of which $3,162 went to food away from home — restaurants, delivery, and takeout. That is 41.5% of the food budget, against 38.8% across all U.S. households.
Notably, the dollar figure fell. Food away from home dropped from $3,296 in 2023 to $3,162 in 2024, a 4.1% decline, while food at home rose from $3,542 to $4,454 — a 25.8% increase. In a single survey year, Gen Z households moved meaningful volume from restaurants into grocery aisles.
That is the opposite of the narrative that dominates most Gen Z spending statistics coverage, and it deserves more scepticism than a single-year move in a subsample usually earns. Category-level estimates for smaller demographic groups carry wider standard errors than national figures, and BLS suppresses estimates whose relative standard error reaches 25%. One year is a data point, not a trend. But the direction is consistent with the strain reading, and it is worth watching in the 2025 release.
What Does Gen Z Buy on Buy Now, Pay Later?
The Federal Reserve’s SHED, fielded in October 2025 among roughly 13,000 adults, gives the clearest federal read on how younger consumers finance purchases. The credit chapter is unambiguous.
Credit and Deferred-Payment Use by Age, October 2025
| Measure | Adults 18–29 | Adults 30–44 | Adults 60+ | All adults | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Used buy now, pay later in prior 12 months | 22% | 21% | 9% | 16% | Federal Reserve SHED |
| Paid late (among BNPL users) | 32% | 31% | 12% | 26% | Federal Reserve SHED |
| Has a credit card | 65% | 78% | 92% | 82% | Federal Reserve SHED |
| Carried a balance (among cardholders) | 46% | 50% | 36% | 45% | Federal Reserve SHED |
| Used payday, pawn, auto title, or refund loan | 9% | 10% | 2% | 7% | Federal Reserve SHED |
| Has outstanding student loans | 25% | 22% | 5% | 16% | Federal Reserve SHED |
Source: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Report on the Economic Well-Being of U.S. Households in 2025.
The 18–29 bracket posts the highest BNPL usage of any age group and the highest late-payment rate among users, while holding the lowest rate of conventional credit card ownership. Those two facts belong in the same sentence. Thirty-five percent of this age group has no credit card at all — no revolving line, no grace period, no conventional buffer. BNPL is not competing with a credit card for these consumers. It is standing in for one.
Where the money goes is equally clear. Across all BNPL users, clothing and accessories was the most common purchase category, but one in five used the product for groceries or food delivery — and 45% of those grocery users said the main reason they used BNPL was that it was the only way they could afford the purchase. Across all users, 29% named that as their primary reason, against 31% who simply wanted to spread payments out.
Sarah Davis: Here is where the fee hides. BNPL is marketed as interest-free, and the headline instalment usually is. The cost shows up at the edges: 64% of users who paid late said they were charged extra for it, 11% of all BNPL users had a payment trigger an overdraft or non-sufficient-funds fee from their bank, and among those charged a late fee, nearly four in ten hit an overdraft. Bank overdraft fees are not on the merchant’s checkout page, but they are part of the price. And the product still does not build what users think it builds — 53% of BNPL users incorrectly believed on-time payments help their credit score, and only 14% answered both credit-mechanics questions correctly. A cohort with 65% card ownership is using a product that, at the time of the survey, could not improve the credit file that keeps them from getting a card. For the wider picture on how those files are scored, see our credit score statistics research.
How Big Is the Gen Z Consumer Market in Total?
Axis Intelligence Research estimates aggregate 2024 Gen Z household outlay at $611.3 billion, calculated as 11,149 thousand Gen Z consumer units multiplied by $54,830 average annual expenditures. The 2023 equivalent, using 8,917 thousand consumer units and $52,891, is $471.6 billion — a 29.6% year-over-year increase.
That growth rate needs immediate qualification, because it is the number most likely to be quoted without one. Decomposed:
- Household formation: +25.0% (8,917k → 11,149k consumer units)
- Per-household spending: +3.67% ($52,891 → $54,830)
- Combined: 1.2503 × 1.0367 − 1 = +29.6%
Roughly 85% of the aggregate increase is Gen Z aging into independent households, not Gen Z households spending more. For anyone sizing this market, that distinction is the whole forecast: the cohort’s aggregate purchasing power is expanding through demographics on a schedule that is already determined, while per-household spending grows at a rate barely above inflation. This complements the demographic and workforce picture in our Gen Z statistics pillar.
Two more compositional notes for anyone modelling the category. Gen Z directed 67.5% of vehicle purchase dollars to used vehicles — $2,948 used against $1,307 new, a 2.26:1 ratio, against 1.14:1 across all households. And Gen Z spent $713 on audio and visual equipment and services against $965 for all households, while spending $353 on pets against $880. The discretionary categories where Gen Z over-indexes are apparel (3.0% of budget versus 2.5%) and food away from home; the ones where they under-index are durable and household-formation categories they have not reached yet.
Methodology
Collection. Household expenditure and income figures come from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Expenditure Surveys, 2024 calendar-year tables, released December 19, 2025 (USDL-25-1586). Generational figures are drawn from Table 2602, Generation of Reference Person, which classifies consumer units by the birth year of the reference person; “Generation Z” is the BLS category “birth year of 1997 or later.” Values were read from the corresponding BLS LABSTAT series (Gen Z series carry the suffix LB1607M; all-consumer-unit series carry LB0101M), which are mirrored in the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis FRED release tables and were retrieved on August 18, 2026.
Credit, deferred-payment, and household-support figures come from the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Report on the Economic Well-Being of U.S. Households in 2025, published May 13, 2026, based on a survey of approximately 13,000 adults fielded in October 2025.
Income basis. All ratios in this analysis use income before taxes. This is not a stylistic choice. BLS states in its Consumer Expenditure Surveys Tables: Getting Started Guide that the provider of its external tax estimation model did not update the model for tax year 2024, so federal and state tax estimates and after-tax income are unavailable in the 2024 tables, LABSTAT database, and public use microdata. An after-tax ratio would be higher than 86.3% for every generation shown; the pre-tax basis is applied uniformly, so cross-generational comparisons hold.
Year-over-year comparisons. The all-household 2023 expenditure figure is stated as $77,280, the value carried in the BLS LABSTAT series, to keep the year-over-year comparison internally consistent with the Gen Z series drawn from the same database. The 2024 CE news release cites a revised 2023 figure of $77,158; using it would change the all-household 2024 increase from 1.62% to 1.78% and would not alter any conclusion here.
GZSSI construction. Components, weights, anchors, and inputs are disclosed in full in the index section above. Every component input is a published federal figure carried as a row in the accompanying dataset. A competent analyst can recompute 49.2 from the four component scores and the four weights.
Scope. Three boundaries define what these figures cover. The Consumer Expenditure Survey measures consumer units — independent households — so the 49% of adults under 30 living with a parent are recorded inside their parents’ budgets, not their own; the Gen Z figures describe the cohort’s independent households only. Expenditure and credit data carry different reference periods (calendar 2024 and October 2025 respectively), and the GZSSI combines them deliberately, dating each input. And BLS suppresses estimates whose relative standard error reaches 25%, so subcategory estimates for a demographic group this size carry wider variance than national figures; single-year movements in narrow subcategories should be read as observations, not trends.
Verification. Every numeric token in this article was matched against a row in the accompanying CSV. All derived figures were computed twice, independently, using different numeric methods, and the fourteen major Gen Z categories were summed against the published total (sum $54,831 against a published $54,830, a $1 rounding difference).
About This Dataset
Gen Z Spending Habits Dataset 2026 contains 226 rows covering U.S. Generation Z household expenditures across 50 categories, income and household characteristics, five-generation comparative spending and income, Federal Reserve credit and deferred-payment measures by age band, and 77 Axis Intelligence Research derived metrics including all Gen Z Spending Strain Index components. Temporal coverage: 2020–2026. Spatial coverage: United States.
Each row carries fourteen provenance fields: metric, value, unit, as-of date, geography, segment, source organisation, source document, source URL, retrieval date, primary-source flag, Axis-calculated flag, method note, and licence. Every derived row states its formula.
Licence: CC BY 4.0. Free to reuse, redistribute, and build upon, including commercially, with attribution.
Cite This Research
APA: Axis Intelligence Research, & Davis, S. (2026). Gen Z spending habits statistics 2026: Where their $611 billion actually goes. Axis Intelligence. https://axis-intelligence.com/gen-z-spending-habits-statistics/
MLA: Axis Intelligence Research, and Sarah Davis. “Gen Z Spending Habits Statistics 2026: Where Their $611 Billion Actually Goes.” Axis Intelligence, 18 Aug. 2026, axis-intelligence.com/gen-z-spending-habits-statistics/.
Chicago: Axis Intelligence Research and Sarah Davis. “Gen Z Spending Habits Statistics 2026: Where Their $611 Billion Actually Goes.” Axis Intelligence, August 18, 2026. https://axis-intelligence.com/gen-z-spending-habits-statistics/.
Dataset: Axis Intelligence Research. Gen Z Spending Habits Dataset 2026. Axis Intelligence, 2026. CC BY 4.0.
Gen Z Spending: Questions Analysts Actually Ask
Why does this analysis use pre-tax income when spending ratios are normally computed after tax?
Because BLS could not publish after-tax income for 2024. The agency’s external tax estimation model was not updated for the 2024 tax year, removing federal tax, state tax, and after-tax income estimates from the annual tables, LABSTAT, and the public use microdata. Applying the pre-tax basis uniformly across all generations preserves the comparison; an after-tax ratio would be higher for every cohort shown, and the Gen Z gap would widen rather than narrow, since lower earners face lower effective rates.
Does a “consumer unit” mean the same thing as a household?
Close, but not identical, and the difference matters at this age. A consumer unit is a group sharing major expenses — housing, food, other living costs — or a financially independent individual. Two roommates splitting nothing but rent can be two consumer units in one dwelling. More consequentially, a 24-year-old living with parents is generally part of the parents’ consumer unit, which is why the survey captures only the independently formed half of this cohort.
Is the 86.3% ratio a savings rate in reverse?
No, and reading it that way overstates the picture. Personal insurance and pensions — $6,357 per Gen Z household, including Social Security contributions and retirement plan payments — are counted inside total expenditures under BLS methodology. Some of what the ratio counts as spending is accumulation. The residual after the 86.3% is unallocated cash flow, not the household’s total saving.
Why did aggregate Gen Z spending jump 29.6% when per-household spending rose only 3.67%?
Household formation. The count of Gen Z consumer units rose 25.0% in a single year, from 8,917 thousand to 11,149 thousand, as more of the cohort reached the age of independent household formation. Aggregate outlay is the product of household count and spend per household, so the two effects compound: 1.2503 × 1.0367 − 1 = 29.6%. Any market sizing that reads the aggregate figure as a demand signal is misreading demographics as behaviour.
Should the Silent Generation’s 103.9% ratio be read as more strain than Gen Z’s 86.3%?
No. The Consumer Expenditure Survey measures income, not asset drawdown. Retiree households routinely fund consumption from savings, pensions paid out of accumulated capital, and home equity, none of which register as income in the survey. A ratio above 100% among retirees reflects the design of the measure. Among generations still earning, Gen Z’s 86.3% is the highest reading, and Millennials at 71.7% and Gen X at 69.1% sit well below it.
How reliable are subcategory estimates for a group this size?
Less reliable than the headline totals, and BLS is explicit about it. The agency suppresses any estimate whose relative standard error reaches 25%, and relative standard errors are larger for demographic subgroups than for national estimates because of smaller sample sizes. Major-category figures for Gen Z — housing, transportation, food — are robust. Narrow lines such as floor coverings ($16) or household textiles ($86) should be treated as directional. This is why the GZSSI draws only on major categories and headline survey rates.
Does buy now, pay later appear anywhere in the Consumer Expenditure Survey spending figures?
Not as a distinct line. BNPL is a financing method, not a category, so a jacket bought in four instalments lands in apparel and services at the purchase price. This is precisely why the GZSSI pulls its deferred-payment component from the Federal Reserve’s SHED rather than from the expenditure data — the two surveys answer different questions, and merging them requires stating which figure came from which and when.
What would move the GZSSI reading down?
Mechanically, four things: a fall in the expenditure-to-income ratio, a shift from renting toward owned dwellings, lower BNPL use or late-payment rates, or wider credit card access among 18–29s. The weights mean the first two carry 55% of the index between them, so a meaningful decline requires movement on income or housing tenure. A drop in BNPL usage alone, with everything else held constant, would move the reading by only a few points — which is itself the finding.
How does Gen Z spending compare with Gen Z debt?
They are separate measures and should not be conflated. Expenditure data captures outflow; debt data captures stock. Gen Z’s 25% student loan incidence and 65% credit card ownership shape the strain reading here, but balance-level analysis sits outside the Consumer Expenditure Survey entirely. Our credit card debt statistics research covers aggregate balances and delinquency, and the Gen Z statistics pillar covers financial sentiment and workforce data.
Related Axis Intelligence Research: Gen Z Statistics · Credit Score Statistics · Credit Card Debt Statistics · Social Media Statistics · All Statistics Research